867
The Big Short Guy Just Bet $1 Billion That the AI Bubble Pops (futurism.com)
submitted 10 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
242 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Just a reminder that the term "AI" stands for a category of systems that contains a lot more than just LLMs.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 29 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Sir, this is the stock market.

    People order with their feelings, not facts.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

    I don't know how this relates to what I said.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Once the ai bubble breaks for llms it will drag general machine learning down with it once panic sets in. People wil dump any stock that even faintly smells like ai.

    Some actually valuable business may disappear, on the other hand those that survive and are undervalued may actually be a good investment opportunities.

    This is not financial advice, to gamble your money is dumb.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, okay, but I still don't know how this relates to what I said.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Um.. You are aware you made your comment about ai being much more then just llm within context of a discussion on wether the ai bubble will burst or not?

    Cause that’s what this post/thread is about.

    The ai bubble will burst nonetheless. I was also playing on the “sir, this is a Wendy’s” meme. In a way joking that your comment is actually not relevant to the discussion.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    I was commenting on what another user said, not on the article OP posted. Not every reply in the comment section is a direct response to the topic at hand. I was talking about the definition of terms, not the stock market.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I am well aware, the first sentence of the person you replied to is a direct responds to the article, the context was not far off.

    But sorry if my reply bothered you, my reply was just as much intended for the random scroller/reader and nothing personal.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent