you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 82 points 11 months ago (20 children)

A car does not randomly have a DUI device...

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 11 months ago* (5 children)

    Especially in Wisconsin. Our drunk driving laws are some of the most lax in the nation. There's a saying that the first DUI is free, and it's only kinda a joke.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Takes a whole lot of DUIs in Wisconsin. Probably years and years of consistently driving home drunk

    Driving drunk is just an expected part of American life in most of the country. If it weren't, we'd have ways to get around other than by car

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    Or maybe she's one of those dimwits who likes to annoy judges by asking them if they are following maritime or common law, and assert that the court doesn't have jurisdiction over them, and that they're not travelling, and that nobody was personally harmed...

    It's impressive just how careful judges tend to be with these nutcases, which I suppose is because it's so far outside the rules of court, that they tend to play too safe and end up vindicating the whole clown show...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago (10 children)

    Seriously, this isn't that sweet of a scene

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Why not? Not a single person drove drunk that day

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    At least not the car that has a DUI device installed. But considering the car is the primary method to get around in the States, some of the people in that story probably drove a car before and after

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Is "waiting a few hours until you're better" not a thing in the US?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    Not really. You can get a DUI for sleeping in the backseat of a car and you can get charged with vagrancy or public intox for sleeping it off in public. You have to go home (or to someone else's home), and the car is probably the only way to get there.

    That's why designated drivers and taxis/ubers are so important. The only alternatives are dangerous or illegal unless you can find and afford a spontaneous hotel or you live in a big enough city to have useful public transit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago*

    It seems to me that there's some weird propaganda going on in this thread. I've only ever known one person who has driven while drunk and the only reason I know that is that he confessed it out of deep shame.

    I guess it's possible that everyone I know is out joyriding every time they drink and just not telling me, but assuming that's not true, I - being from and in the US - never really experienced a culture remotely supportive of drunk driving.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    That's because they didn't include the part where she lands flat on her ass laughing when she realizes "this isn't even MY CAR you guys!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment