you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 74 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Go Colorado Sun! Proud sponsor for many years!

Reading the article, I am very confused. It appears that they simply decided a random person was the culprit because she was recorded as driving through town during the time period of the package theft, and that's all they had?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    That's what I gathered as well. They mentioned there was doorbell footage but refused to show it to her. I'm guessing they saw she was in town, saw a person that maybe partially could have resembled her maybe if you squinted on the doorbell footage, and said that was all the evidence they needed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    There is the weirdly pushy way the police officer tried to get her to confess that seems to imply that, too. They had a hunch, and hoped the person would be dumb enough to incriminate herself. It's a real shame she only exonerated herself, I am sure they would have loved it if she had tracked down the real thief.

  • source
  • parent