you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 80 points 10 months ago (2 children)

In addition, Narayanan says he uncovered a suspicious line of code broadcasted from the company to the vacuum, timestamped to the exact moment it stopped working. “Someone — or something — had remotely issued a kill command,” he wrote.

“I reversed the script change and rebooted the device,” he wrote. “It came back to life instantly. They hadn’t merely incorporated a remote control feature. They had used it to permanently disable my device.”

In short, he said, the company that made the device had “the power to remotely disable devices, and used it against me for blocking their data collection… Whether it was intentional punishment or automated enforcement of ‘compliance,’ the result was the same: a consumer device had turned on its owner.”

They kill switched it remotely. Yikes.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    All IoT devices do this to keep you from blocking their data collection. They won’t work reliably without a regular ping home. They lock up if they can’t phone home frequently enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)

    Tapo's sockets don't - in fact they explicitly have a 'local only' function. All you lose is control outside your home network.

    Tuya on the other hand will start leeching off the fucking Bluetooth of your pairing device if you hobble them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    tapo cameras do. mine all went offline and factory reset themselves after not having internet access or even accounts for several months, all at the same time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments