A Virginia couple, Charles and Judith Voorhees, filed an emergency motion in federal court on Thursday, seeking to halt the project, alleging that it violates multiple federal preservation and planning laws.

The Voorhees lawsuit seeking to halt the project argues that Trump bypassed laws meant to protect national landmarks and public transparency.

At stake is whether a sitting president can unilaterally alter one of the country’s most symbolically important buildings, or whether the "People’s House" must remain subject to the same review and accountability standards that govern other federal projects.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 35 points 10 months ago (1 child)

No they ruled that a president can't do crimes

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    ...if the act is relevant to performing his role as president.

    Still fucked up, but nothing about this was required to perform his role.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago

    "In order to grift harder and accept more donations from the middle east, I needed to build a ballroom we could dance with young girls together in where the filthy common folk couldn't see. It's really just for work. You should thank me"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    To host state banquets, which have become larger and more frequent since the advent of the jet engine, and for which there is no suitable large interior venue at the WH.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    Building a monument to his best mate Epstein will help him in his daily duties ...of eating hamberders, golfing, sex trafficking kids, and planning the demise of his enemies (real, or perceived).

  • source
  • parent