They don’t understand probability

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 10 months ago (1 child)

I am guessing they took the average homicide rate per ride in the metro, and used those rates to create the per capita rate assuming they take 500 rides a year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago*

    Oh yeah I can see it, that would make sense! Thanks!

    Since a lot of tickets will be bought anonymously you can't easily count unique users of the subway system, so the raw data probably consisted of numbers of homicides, and number of rides taken by all customers combined.

    But the rate between those wouldn't fit the per person risk they want to be comparing. So to calculate a risk to a person they must have assumed a realistic case towards the higher end of ridership, that is, a commuter commuting 5 days a week for 50 weeks a year, to work and back, that would give the 500 rides number.

  • source
  • parent