you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 11 months ago (14 children)

I think Zorin is a pretty solid choice for people with no Linux experience tbh.

It’s at least going to feel familiar

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (11 children)

    They charge extra for theming that people could get themselves for free. I don’t like that it’s taking advantage of vulnerable people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (10 children)

    I don’t think that’s “taking advantage of vulnerable people”

    The options still exist for people to learn and theming is incredibly inconsequential.

    They’re monetising to support development in a minimally impactful way, that is completely optional, and I think that’s a good thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago* (9 children)

    They should advertise that everything is free and can be installed after installation if you choose not say $80 gets you a Windows like desktop and software replacements that will save you thousands (Blender/Xournal++/OfficeSuite)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    The value proposition is ease of use and integration of these theming utilities.

    I honestly think this monetisation strategy of theirs is a non-issue.

    People who want a streamlined experience have the option of paying for that, people who want the option of doing it all themselves have that opportunity too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (7 children)

    My problem is them not communicating that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (6 children)

    Not communicating that there are alternatives to their services?

    I don’t really think it’s their responsibility to spoon feed alternatives to their customers; they’re not being anticompetitive, they’re not being deceptive, they’re not blocking alternatives.

    I think your requirements here are unfair and kind of irrational

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    That the stuff included is free and installable on it’s own.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)

    So what’s your issue then? Zorin has a free version that people can opt for if they want

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    That they aren’t communicating it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    Why do you believe they need to?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Because I believe not doing so is exploiting people that don’t know better.

    If it wasn’t then there wouldn’t be a problem with being upfront about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago

    Okay, I guess I simply disagree that it’s their responsibility to tell other people there are alternatives to their service and I don’t think any other software vendor is beholden to such a requirement either.

  • source
  • parent