492
New Rules Could Force Tesla to Redesign Its Door Handles. That’s Harder Than It Sounds (www.wired.com)
submitted 11 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
171 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://archive.ph/2GcBa

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 34 points 11 months ago (3 children)

A lot of upvotes here, and I think they're ignoring how much is involved in production pipelines and the overhead of sourcing suppliers. That said, Musk has a habit of throwing in last minute changes and the company manages to handle those but much like self driving they ship late

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah let's see, if the handle would have to be a different shape, they may need a different cutout for the door, different handle moulds, different mechanical parts, updated electronics... does anyone have a fucking clue how difficult it is to program one of those robotic arms? How expensive new moulds are? Any other potential knock-on effects this may have on the internal design?

    People with the mentality of 'it's just a small plug at the bottom of the pool, how bad could it possibly be if we removed it'

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    They only have to redesign a new door, not an entire car.

    Sure, it isn't as easy adding a dent so you can grab the handle. But it is a lot easier and cheaper than designing a new door, which they do for every new model.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    By the time you're deciding to make all those potential changes, now the question is, if we already have to reprogram the robots, and get new moulds, do we want to make any other changes on this door at the same time, so that we don't have twice the downtime to make the 2 changes?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent