submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [M] to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
 

Note, there are some concerns with the items listed on this page. See the comments for context.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/37136621

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 11 months ago (7 children)

Okay, whoever recommends Proton as a reliable source of online privacy should be immediately be seen as an op. That fucker caved under pressure by agencies.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 24 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Are there any providers that refuse to comply with law enforcement? The best seems to be the ones that only collect the bare minimum amount of data in the first place

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    All companies have to comply with local laws. Even a huge company like Apple has to submit to laws of any country they operate in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    They purposely logged information in their mail servers which resulted in a protestor being arrested. You can easily design a service not to record such data (Ex: PIA).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    You talking about the French protester from several years ago? Yeah, bud didn't even take the smallest step, like using a vpn, to protect himself. At the time, Proton said if a vpn was used they wouldn't have any data to give to the cops.

    Same thing would have happened if the protester was using Tuta or any other email service.

  • source
  • parent