18+

You must be 18+ to view this community

You must be at least eighteen years old to view this. Are you over eighteen and willing to see adult content?

35
AMA/Ask me Anything - 24F - Corporate slut, I've slept around quite a bit ;) (lemmynsfw.com)
submitted 10 months ago by to c/asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com
NSFW 103 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hey lemmy! I've been very sexual active but now that I moved I'm not too active. I've had over a 100 partners so far so I'm a bit experienced lol.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

I am 99.9% confident that I am not a nymphomaniac. I kinda just act on my desires rather than suppressing them. From what I understand I should be in a far worse mental state rn, if I was a nymphomaniac. (No sex since a few weeks) Maybe there's a spectrum to being a nymphomaniac? If so I'm probably there somewhere.

W.r.t to not being able to focus if I didn't have sex, I do have that but it's not too common. The "hunger" dies down naturally when it's not a good thing.

Tbh the numbers are fascinating but I have to take it with a kilo of salt. I really refuse to trust data that talk about "taboo" aspects. I don't know how or if the numbers are skewed but I just can't trust them. That being said, I am obviously an outlier so ig that won't change lol.

Also I doubt if I'll "keep the pace". I don't think I'm getting any more attractive and I'm already seeing signs of lower energy. So i really doubt if I'll be able to (or even want to) "keep the pace". Also there's the COVID effect. Lockdowns and stuff really made me overcompensate lol.

I don't think I've ever fucked for 8 full hours. I've fucked over a longer period but never only sex or for as long (maybe most at a go 3 hrs?). 8 hours is really really impressive!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    Yeah, I am not a psychologist or anything, but I am glad that you didn't take the question as an insult, it came from a place of genuine, potential concern, but it sounds like you've got a decent grasp on yourself as a person, so that's good!

    Yeah, I think I would agree that there is probably a spectrum to nymphomania, and you don't seem to place nearly as highly on it as the woman I knew.

    I also totally understand your apprehension to just take the data at face value.

    Those numbers come from uh... I think it was a fairly large sex toy company that hired an actual sexologist to conduct the study, ie, they have formal training in both psychology and statistics and polling related concepts like how to design surveys with as unbiased questions as possible.

    IIRC, I went with that study months ago because it was fairly recent, and actually had a larger sample size than the other academically published studies I'd seen from within the last 5ish years.

    That being said, the other recent studies I've seen, with regard to lifetime sex partners... they are all generally within this same ballpark, such that 100+ partners is always going to significantly be an outlier.

    The other thing, at least in the US but it is present in other places as well:

    There is just generally a rise of incels and femcels, people who have never had sex, or have had no sex within the last year.

    The average a person loses their virginity at is also going up, for all sexes/genders.

    So... yeah, part of why its so statistically unusual to have 100+ partners is that increasing numbers of people... just never fuck.

    The extreme in the opposite direction, basically.

    Random, but: is 'ig' short for I Guess?

    IIRC is If I Recall Correctly.

    I realize I am about a decade older than you ... I am no longer 'with it' when it comes to modern abbreviations and lingo and such, lol.

    As to 'keeping the pace': all good all good lol, I wasn't trying to comment on you personally with that, was just trying to do some mathematical extraploation as a theoretical example, to try and explain standard deviations and such a bit better.

    As to max encounter duration:

    Well hey, 3 hrs is definitely quite an enoyable time, but also thank you, and obviously yes I am bragging just a bit, lol.

    I'm a different kind of statistical outlier!

    Yay!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I don't doubt reality is too far from the numbers to be honest, but I'm not going to trust it too much yk?

    Yes incel/femcel stuff is on the rise but tbh I haven't noticed that too much in my peers. I have seen it significantly more in my juniors, tho that could be a result of my company and stuff.

    "Keeping with the pace", i didn't take it personally btw do don't worry about that. I completed missed the fact that it could be you extrapolating!

    8hrs: Outlier 🤝 Outlier

    PS: someone else commented here saying that they have a 200+ body count and are like 30s male. I'm sure you'll be interested lol.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •