you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Before Trump, US institutions generally liked to at least keep up the pretense

Accurate.

which means that they often did have to make rules that aren't as bullshit as they could have been

Yes, but that doesn't mean that they weren't STILL 80-95% bullshit by volume.

In south and middle american dictatorships, they don't have to give a single flying fuck.

And they also don't have anywhere near the pressure from the most powerful corporations in the world.

Or elections designed to be unduly influenced by the highly organized and systemic corruption of corporations and their lobbies rather than the comparatively haphazard organization of less official corruption.

That makes a much bigger difference than the inherent motivation and fear of public resistance of the leaders themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    And they also don’t have anywhere near the pressure from the most powerful corporations in the world.

    Or elections designed to be unduly influenced by the highly organized and systemic corruption of corporations and their lobbies rather than the comparatively haphazard organization of less official corruption.

    In the case of banana republics, corruption for specific corporations is literally their reason for existence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment