▲ 365 ▼ This definetly seem very intentional… (ttrpg.network) submitted 10 months ago by jounniy@ttrpg.network to c/rpgmemes@ttrpg.network 117 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 10 months ago (2 children) Detect magic. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cjoll4@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (1 child) Nope permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] baahb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago (2 children) Technically it only refers to visible creatures. Objects doesnt have the adjective visible. Unlikely, but a particularly bull headed person could read this as though detect magic could identify invisible objects. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago I'm kinda surprised how vague many of the DnD rules are written. Didn't they have a rules lawyer at hand when writing these? permalink fedilink source parent [–] jounniy@ttrpg.network [S] 5 points 10 months ago That depends on interpretation of the sentence structure. It could mean "any visible [creatures and objects]" or "any [visible creatures] and objects". permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gutek8134@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago I've specifically focused on means that don't require a spell slot to use. Left familiar as an exception because people like to have them anyway and it can be ritual cast. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cjoll4@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (1 child) Nope permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] baahb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago (2 children) Technically it only refers to visible creatures. Objects doesnt have the adjective visible. Unlikely, but a particularly bull headed person could read this as though detect magic could identify invisible objects. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago I'm kinda surprised how vague many of the DnD rules are written. Didn't they have a rules lawyer at hand when writing these? permalink fedilink source parent [–] jounniy@ttrpg.network [S] 5 points 10 months ago That depends on interpretation of the sentence structure. It could mean "any visible [creatures and objects]" or "any [visible creatures] and objects". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] baahb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago (2 children) Technically it only refers to visible creatures. Objects doesnt have the adjective visible. Unlikely, but a particularly bull headed person could read this as though detect magic could identify invisible objects. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago I'm kinda surprised how vague many of the DnD rules are written. Didn't they have a rules lawyer at hand when writing these? permalink fedilink source parent [–] jounniy@ttrpg.network [S] 5 points 10 months ago That depends on interpretation of the sentence structure. It could mean "any visible [creatures and objects]" or "any [visible creatures] and objects". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago I'm kinda surprised how vague many of the DnD rules are written. Didn't they have a rules lawyer at hand when writing these? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jounniy@ttrpg.network [S] 5 points 10 months ago That depends on interpretation of the sentence structure. It could mean "any visible [creatures and objects]" or "any [visible creatures] and objects". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Gutek8134@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago I've specifically focused on means that don't require a spell slot to use. Left familiar as an exception because people like to have them anyway and it can be ritual cast. permalink fedilink source parent
