this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
163 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7499 readers
79 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For me I say that a truck with a cab longer than its bed is not a truck, but an SUV with an overgrown bumper.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Microtransactions are not acceptable in full retail single player games. I don't care if it's only cosmetics. If i pay 60 bucks for it, i better get the whole damn thing. Looking at you, Diablo 4.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Related: If it's more than 99¢, it's not a "microtransaction". There's nothing "micro" about $99.99. That's an "in-app purchase".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. But you can see it the other way, the "micro" now refers to what you are getting and *not *what you are paying.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

@HalJor @Souvlaki Microtransactions? More like Pettytransactions, amiright? :ablobcatbongo:

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Further, I'm convinced the term "microtransaction" was introduced by corporations cynically and insidiously knowing full well they would ramp the price up over time deluding the meaning of the term.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Agree 100%. I'd honestly argue there shouldn't be microtransactions in any single-player game, unless it is free.

I miss the days when you unlocked cosmetics, etc. by actually playing the game and doing achievements rather than needing to buy them through "micro"transactions.