you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 3 years ago (16 children)

That's basically what Germany did. They recently shut down their nuclear plants and restarted their coal plants.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    And yet coal power production is practically at the lowest level ever (except for corona months 03/20 and 04/20)

    https://energy-charts.info/charts/energy/chart.htm?l=de&c=DE&chartColumnSorting=default&year=-1&month=-1&stacking=stacked_absolute×lider=1&legendItems=000001010000000000000

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Germany still has a very long way to go to be carbon neutral.

    Almost 79% of its primary energy consumption is fossil fuel. 17% is renewable.

    For comparison in France 46% of the primary energy consumption is fossil fuel, 14% renewable and 40% nuclear.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Germany is now using coal as base load. The main reason coal has not increased considerably is because all this new generation and loss of nuclear baseload along with limited ng generation has resulted in average energy prices doubling from 2017 to 2021 prices. Simply put the cost of energy is now so high that people and industry is using less. Done large industries shut down with loss of jobs. Solar and wind had been very expensive even with government subsidies. Subsidies that take money out of government coffers resulting in less services. This ignoring the increase in energy importation of which some may be from coal generation.

    Shutting down nuclear simply denied millions of people a clean energy source unless they were willing to pay nearly double that of past years.

    https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/germany-goes-all-energy-transition-with-nuclear-shutdowns-2023-04-19/#:~:text=The%20steep%20climb%20in%20electricity,hydropower%20output%20due%20to%20drought.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    That is just blatant misinformation. Name one single coal plant that has been restarted since nuclear power was phased out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago* (4 children)

    https://www.dw.com/en/germany-reactivates-coal-fired-power-plant-to-save-gas/a-62893497

    The Mehrum plant in Hohenhameln and the Heyden plant in Petershagen (whose operation has been extended).

    Unless your nitpick is that these were started before the final nuclear shutdown, but I never said otherwise, only that both things happened recently.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I understood it as coal was phased in as nuclear was phased out. The thing that astounds me still though is how recent the last 3 were shut down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I think they were planning on natural gas, but that went down the tubes because they were planning on buying from Russia. Coal plants were restarted to fill the gap.

    What the plan is now, I don't know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    The end goal was always renewables with smart net, storage and hydrogen plants to offset spikes. Gas prices are dropping again, so it will be used as a bridging solution. Energy production in Germany is actually on track of its climate goals compared to transportation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    The actual problem was stopping to fund solar, smashing a hundred thousand jobs in renewables under the pretense of "saving workers". ~20k jobs in coal heroically saved.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    But they could easily do it (and get paid by fossil fuel lobbyists) because the discussion is completely twisted anyway. And most constructive discussion of the topic will be drowned in fairy tales about renewables not working, nuclear being our only savior and other bullshit.

    Basically this whole thread is a perfect example. We discuss electricity production because that's the direction the nuclear social media cult is pushing every discussion into...

    The actual report linked in this thread is for a German report of construction and traffic sectors not meeting their emission reduction goals... and I'm pretty sure neither coal nor nuclear is used to power cars nowadays. And the electrification bottle neck for transport is the production pace of electric cars, their still too high prize, limits on loading infra-structure etc., not actually energy per se.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment