you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You can either buy an app or pay with your data.

No this implies you get a choice, which you don't. You can get it for free and sell your data, or you can pay for it...and still also sell your data. The real money is in the data, they won't give that up...ever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Can you use an open source weather app, or is the problem deeper than that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I'm not the person who posted the widget issue, but IME many FOSS solutions (not just weather-related) are more often than not aesthetically/UX crap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    you can deny location position to your weather app. show the weather for cities you are interested in. Get weather by notifications for "seemlessness"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, I was just curious if the app could harvest it anyway via the SDK or something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 11 months ago

    Yeah, that's true. Often people will take the money from users AND from selling data. But you can (usually) verify if that's the case by checking the app's permissions required.

    The point stands, however: you either pay for the software with money, or with data - with the only exception being the unusually rare FOSS project here and there, which either lives in relative obscurity or grows to become large enough for the creators to either start requiring money, or just fold under the load...

  • source
  • parent