Kissaki comments on Let's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Option

Let's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Option (blog.edwardloveall.com)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by biotin7@sopuli.xyz to c/opensource@programming.dev

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was curious about your opinions (Not my article). Also this mentions Fossil & Pijul. Which are fully-fledged Git-Alternatives (Not just github)

[–] Kissaki@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Alternative for github: codeberg.org

only for ~~public~~ FOSS

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Partially true, yes, that is a downside: codeberg currently does not allow non-free licenses. But no, a repository does not have to be public.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz [S] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

Why is that a bad thing ?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Kissaki@programming.dev 1 point 10 months ago*

It is not a bad thing.

The comment claimed "alternative to GitHub". I pointed out that it's an alternative for only a subset of use cases/projects. Without that clarification, someone may explore or follow through and be disappointed.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

lemmy:	0.19.20
mlmym (mschae):	26.3.4