▲ 241 ▼ Ubuntu mod team takes anti-queer "Don't say gay" stance. (www.reddit.com) submitted 11 months ago by Launch@piefed.social to c/linux@lemmy.ml 102 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 71 points 11 months ago (2 children) "If we allow your flag, then we have to admit also other similar political flags, both supporting and opposing diversity." Consider the following: no, they don't. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 51 points 11 months ago (2 children) Crazy statement, if we accept the gays we should accept the nazis too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 13 points 11 months ago (1 child) Our terminal liberalism forbids us from saying one thing is better or worse than another thing ! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] comfy@lemmy.ml 10 points 11 months ago You have to understand, it just wouldn't be fair to put inclusion over exclusion ! You care about equality, don't you? permalink fedilink source parent [–] moomoomoo309@programming.dev -2 points 11 months ago (1 child) Sure, up to the point where they harass someone or attack them, or have a history of doing so. A belief of "I think some people do not deserve to exist" is different from a belief of "People should be allowed to X" or "People who Y should not be harassed". A nazi sympathizer who thinks nazis shouldn't be attacked is fine, a nazi who attacks others is not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 7 points 11 months ago (1 child) Nah, fuck nazis. They don't deserve to exist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] moomoomoo309@programming.dev -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) I agree in principle, but you're not going to win any battles with that mindset. They'll just respond with "so much for the tolerant left". Victimization is a beloved pastime for them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago (1 child) A brick is approaching a Nazi's teeth from an initial distance of 10m horizontally and a velocity of 10m/s. You may assume the absence of air resistance and treat the brick as a point mass. Calculate the initial angle(s) required to remove the most teeth and determine whether the Nazi can complain about the tolerant left before a brick removes their ability to speak. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] moomoomoo309@programming.dev -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) This response is entirely unhelpful. Yes. Fuck nazis. I get it. This adds nothing. Nazis are bad, but we must coexist with them, lest we round them all up and get rid of them, which isn't gonna happen. If it were that easy, we'd have done it already! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago We may have to coexist with them from a logistical standpoint but we do not have to tolerate them. The paradox of tolerance is that we must not tolerate the intolerant. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 11 months ago People unironicly think being trans is a political statement. People are really dumb. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 51 points 11 months ago (2 children) Crazy statement, if we accept the gays we should accept the nazis too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 13 points 11 months ago (1 child) Our terminal liberalism forbids us from saying one thing is better or worse than another thing ! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] comfy@lemmy.ml 10 points 11 months ago You have to understand, it just wouldn't be fair to put inclusion over exclusion ! You care about equality, don't you? permalink fedilink source parent [–] moomoomoo309@programming.dev -2 points 11 months ago (1 child) Sure, up to the point where they harass someone or attack them, or have a history of doing so. A belief of "I think some people do not deserve to exist" is different from a belief of "People should be allowed to X" or "People who Y should not be harassed". A nazi sympathizer who thinks nazis shouldn't be attacked is fine, a nazi who attacks others is not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 7 points 11 months ago (1 child) Nah, fuck nazis. They don't deserve to exist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] moomoomoo309@programming.dev -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) I agree in principle, but you're not going to win any battles with that mindset. They'll just respond with "so much for the tolerant left". Victimization is a beloved pastime for them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago (1 child) A brick is approaching a Nazi's teeth from an initial distance of 10m horizontally and a velocity of 10m/s. You may assume the absence of air resistance and treat the brick as a point mass. Calculate the initial angle(s) required to remove the most teeth and determine whether the Nazi can complain about the tolerant left before a brick removes their ability to speak. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] moomoomoo309@programming.dev -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) This response is entirely unhelpful. Yes. Fuck nazis. I get it. This adds nothing. Nazis are bad, but we must coexist with them, lest we round them all up and get rid of them, which isn't gonna happen. If it were that easy, we'd have done it already! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago We may have to coexist with them from a logistical standpoint but we do not have to tolerate them. The paradox of tolerance is that we must not tolerate the intolerant. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 13 points 11 months ago (1 child) Our terminal liberalism forbids us from saying one thing is better or worse than another thing ! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] comfy@lemmy.ml 10 points 11 months ago You have to understand, it just wouldn't be fair to put inclusion over exclusion ! You care about equality, don't you? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 10 points 11 months ago You have to understand, it just wouldn't be fair to put inclusion over exclusion ! You care about equality, don't you? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] moomoomoo309@programming.dev -2 points 11 months ago (1 child) Sure, up to the point where they harass someone or attack them, or have a history of doing so. A belief of "I think some people do not deserve to exist" is different from a belief of "People should be allowed to X" or "People who Y should not be harassed". A nazi sympathizer who thinks nazis shouldn't be attacked is fine, a nazi who attacks others is not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 7 points 11 months ago (1 child) Nah, fuck nazis. They don't deserve to exist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] moomoomoo309@programming.dev -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) I agree in principle, but you're not going to win any battles with that mindset. They'll just respond with "so much for the tolerant left". Victimization is a beloved pastime for them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago (1 child) A brick is approaching a Nazi's teeth from an initial distance of 10m horizontally and a velocity of 10m/s. You may assume the absence of air resistance and treat the brick as a point mass. Calculate the initial angle(s) required to remove the most teeth and determine whether the Nazi can complain about the tolerant left before a brick removes their ability to speak. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] moomoomoo309@programming.dev -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) This response is entirely unhelpful. Yes. Fuck nazis. I get it. This adds nothing. Nazis are bad, but we must coexist with them, lest we round them all up and get rid of them, which isn't gonna happen. If it were that easy, we'd have done it already! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago We may have to coexist with them from a logistical standpoint but we do not have to tolerate them. The paradox of tolerance is that we must not tolerate the intolerant. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 7 points 11 months ago (1 child) Nah, fuck nazis. They don't deserve to exist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] moomoomoo309@programming.dev -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) I agree in principle, but you're not going to win any battles with that mindset. They'll just respond with "so much for the tolerant left". Victimization is a beloved pastime for them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago (1 child) A brick is approaching a Nazi's teeth from an initial distance of 10m horizontally and a velocity of 10m/s. You may assume the absence of air resistance and treat the brick as a point mass. Calculate the initial angle(s) required to remove the most teeth and determine whether the Nazi can complain about the tolerant left before a brick removes their ability to speak. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] moomoomoo309@programming.dev -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) This response is entirely unhelpful. Yes. Fuck nazis. I get it. This adds nothing. Nazis are bad, but we must coexist with them, lest we round them all up and get rid of them, which isn't gonna happen. If it were that easy, we'd have done it already! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago We may have to coexist with them from a logistical standpoint but we do not have to tolerate them. The paradox of tolerance is that we must not tolerate the intolerant. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] moomoomoo309@programming.dev -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) I agree in principle, but you're not going to win any battles with that mindset. They'll just respond with "so much for the tolerant left". Victimization is a beloved pastime for them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago (1 child) A brick is approaching a Nazi's teeth from an initial distance of 10m horizontally and a velocity of 10m/s. You may assume the absence of air resistance and treat the brick as a point mass. Calculate the initial angle(s) required to remove the most teeth and determine whether the Nazi can complain about the tolerant left before a brick removes their ability to speak. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] moomoomoo309@programming.dev -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) This response is entirely unhelpful. Yes. Fuck nazis. I get it. This adds nothing. Nazis are bad, but we must coexist with them, lest we round them all up and get rid of them, which isn't gonna happen. If it were that easy, we'd have done it already! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago We may have to coexist with them from a logistical standpoint but we do not have to tolerate them. The paradox of tolerance is that we must not tolerate the intolerant. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago (1 child) A brick is approaching a Nazi's teeth from an initial distance of 10m horizontally and a velocity of 10m/s. You may assume the absence of air resistance and treat the brick as a point mass. Calculate the initial angle(s) required to remove the most teeth and determine whether the Nazi can complain about the tolerant left before a brick removes their ability to speak. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] moomoomoo309@programming.dev -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) This response is entirely unhelpful. Yes. Fuck nazis. I get it. This adds nothing. Nazis are bad, but we must coexist with them, lest we round them all up and get rid of them, which isn't gonna happen. If it were that easy, we'd have done it already! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago We may have to coexist with them from a logistical standpoint but we do not have to tolerate them. The paradox of tolerance is that we must not tolerate the intolerant. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] moomoomoo309@programming.dev -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) This response is entirely unhelpful. Yes. Fuck nazis. I get it. This adds nothing. Nazis are bad, but we must coexist with them, lest we round them all up and get rid of them, which isn't gonna happen. If it were that easy, we'd have done it already! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago We may have to coexist with them from a logistical standpoint but we do not have to tolerate them. The paradox of tolerance is that we must not tolerate the intolerant. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago We may have to coexist with them from a logistical standpoint but we do not have to tolerate them. The paradox of tolerance is that we must not tolerate the intolerant. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 11 months ago People unironicly think being trans is a political statement. People are really dumb. permalink fedilink source parent