▲ 239 ▼ How OnlyFans Piracy Is Ruining the Internet for Everyone | Innocent sites are being delisted from Google because of copyright takedown requests against rampant OnlyFans piracy. (www.404media.co) submitted 1 year ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/technology@lemmy.world 70 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 5 points 1 year ago (9 children) The reactions are legal compliance permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) Yes. So? How is that relevant, if we are talking about companies automating the requests with no regards for their accuracy ruining the internet? Isn't it a given? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Ulrich@feddit.org -3 points 1 year ago* (4 children) Because the companies have no say in the matter. It doesn't matter if they're accurate or not, they have to comply with the law by taking them down. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Again, it's not the companies complying with the takedowns we are complaining about. It's the companies that automatically send takedowns, with no regard for whether the takedowns are legitimate. These companies are supposed to have a duty to verify their copyright claim is valid before sending a takedown. But no one is enforcing it, so they don't do it. That is the biggest issue here. We need to punish companies and individuals for sending illegitimate takedown requests. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Ulrich@feddit.org -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) I don't understand why you just keep repeating yourself These companies are supposed to have a duty to verify their copyright claim is valid before sending a takedown Again, no they don't. They are legally required to take it down by the DMCA until it's disproven. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* How can the company SENDING the takedown request be legally required to take anything down?! They have nothing to take down. If they could take it down themselves, why would they need to send a DMCA takedown request?! permalink fedilink source parent [–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago "These companies," in this case, being those sending the takedown requests. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 3 points 1 year ago Its about sending the takedown request in the first place, not the company complying with it. Its an entirely, automated process with no regard to validity permalink fedilink source parent [–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) They're not exercising due diligence in confirming that the takedown requests are legitimate (for example, by actually asking the content owners). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago Over again, yes, that's legal compliance. That's what the law demands. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) Yes. So? How is that relevant, if we are talking about companies automating the requests with no regards for their accuracy ruining the internet? Isn't it a given? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Ulrich@feddit.org -3 points 1 year ago* (4 children) Because the companies have no say in the matter. It doesn't matter if they're accurate or not, they have to comply with the law by taking them down. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Again, it's not the companies complying with the takedowns we are complaining about. It's the companies that automatically send takedowns, with no regard for whether the takedowns are legitimate. These companies are supposed to have a duty to verify their copyright claim is valid before sending a takedown. But no one is enforcing it, so they don't do it. That is the biggest issue here. We need to punish companies and individuals for sending illegitimate takedown requests. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Ulrich@feddit.org -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) I don't understand why you just keep repeating yourself These companies are supposed to have a duty to verify their copyright claim is valid before sending a takedown Again, no they don't. They are legally required to take it down by the DMCA until it's disproven. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* How can the company SENDING the takedown request be legally required to take anything down?! They have nothing to take down. If they could take it down themselves, why would they need to send a DMCA takedown request?! permalink fedilink source parent [–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago "These companies," in this case, being those sending the takedown requests. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -3 points 1 year ago* (4 children) Because the companies have no say in the matter. It doesn't matter if they're accurate or not, they have to comply with the law by taking them down. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Again, it's not the companies complying with the takedowns we are complaining about. It's the companies that automatically send takedowns, with no regard for whether the takedowns are legitimate. These companies are supposed to have a duty to verify their copyright claim is valid before sending a takedown. But no one is enforcing it, so they don't do it. That is the biggest issue here. We need to punish companies and individuals for sending illegitimate takedown requests. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Ulrich@feddit.org -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) I don't understand why you just keep repeating yourself These companies are supposed to have a duty to verify their copyright claim is valid before sending a takedown Again, no they don't. They are legally required to take it down by the DMCA until it's disproven. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* How can the company SENDING the takedown request be legally required to take anything down?! They have nothing to take down. If they could take it down themselves, why would they need to send a DMCA takedown request?! permalink fedilink source parent [–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago "These companies," in this case, being those sending the takedown requests. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Again, it's not the companies complying with the takedowns we are complaining about. It's the companies that automatically send takedowns, with no regard for whether the takedowns are legitimate. These companies are supposed to have a duty to verify their copyright claim is valid before sending a takedown. But no one is enforcing it, so they don't do it. That is the biggest issue here. We need to punish companies and individuals for sending illegitimate takedown requests. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Ulrich@feddit.org -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) I don't understand why you just keep repeating yourself These companies are supposed to have a duty to verify their copyright claim is valid before sending a takedown Again, no they don't. They are legally required to take it down by the DMCA until it's disproven. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* How can the company SENDING the takedown request be legally required to take anything down?! They have nothing to take down. If they could take it down themselves, why would they need to send a DMCA takedown request?! permalink fedilink source parent [–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago "These companies," in this case, being those sending the takedown requests. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Ulrich@feddit.org -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) I don't understand why you just keep repeating yourself These companies are supposed to have a duty to verify their copyright claim is valid before sending a takedown Again, no they don't. They are legally required to take it down by the DMCA until it's disproven. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* How can the company SENDING the takedown request be legally required to take anything down?! They have nothing to take down. If they could take it down themselves, why would they need to send a DMCA takedown request?! permalink fedilink source parent [–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago "These companies," in this case, being those sending the takedown requests. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* How can the company SENDING the takedown request be legally required to take anything down?! They have nothing to take down. If they could take it down themselves, why would they need to send a DMCA takedown request?! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago "These companies," in this case, being those sending the takedown requests. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 3 points 1 year ago Its about sending the takedown request in the first place, not the company complying with it. Its an entirely, automated process with no regard to validity permalink fedilink source parent
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) They're not exercising due diligence in confirming that the takedown requests are legitimate (for example, by actually asking the content owners). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago Over again, yes, that's legal compliance. That's what the law demands. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago Over again, yes, that's legal compliance. That's what the law demands. permalink fedilink source parent