▲ 823 ▼ Mastodon says it doesn't 'have the means' to comply with age verification laws (techcrunch.com) submitted 1 year ago by General_Effort@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 219 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (3 children) "What if I WANT my kids watching porn???" Really bold stratagy you got there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 year ago Where the hell did I say porn? You think they can't block anything else? Also, so what if I did? Shouldn't that be a parents decision? Say I'm fine with them watching it at 16yo. Shouldn't that be up to the parent, not the government? People who give up their freedom to the government are going to lose far more freedom than they're OK with losing. It starts with something you might agree with, but it never stops there. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago* That argument suggests you bought the lie of what the age verification is for. When every service is required to perform age verification, it quickly becomes not about porn but control. They're trying to close the Pandora's box that is the internet decades after the fact, and they're learning the hard way how impossible and unpopular that is permalink fedilink source parent [–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago "Promoting homosexuality" was illegal in state schools for half my childhood. Imagine the ignorant, hateful people arguing against same-sex sexual education - they would probably say "YOU want to show PORN to CHILDREN" too. It's a bad-faith character assassination that shouldn't have merit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 year ago Where the hell did I say porn? You think they can't block anything else? Also, so what if I did? Shouldn't that be a parents decision? Say I'm fine with them watching it at 16yo. Shouldn't that be up to the parent, not the government? People who give up their freedom to the government are going to lose far more freedom than they're OK with losing. It starts with something you might agree with, but it never stops there. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago* That argument suggests you bought the lie of what the age verification is for. When every service is required to perform age verification, it quickly becomes not about porn but control. They're trying to close the Pandora's box that is the internet decades after the fact, and they're learning the hard way how impossible and unpopular that is permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago "Promoting homosexuality" was illegal in state schools for half my childhood. Imagine the ignorant, hateful people arguing against same-sex sexual education - they would probably say "YOU want to show PORN to CHILDREN" too. It's a bad-faith character assassination that shouldn't have merit. permalink fedilink source parent