you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh yes I forgot that pointing out the flaws in privacy-related things, so people who are interested in switching know what they're potentially getting in to, is a big NoNo here...all hail the perfect FOSS which can do no wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Don't feel pressured by me. If you feel pressured yourself, it may be a form of projected guilt.

    If you don't find privacy and security important enough to give up your connectivity or usability, that's perfectly fine. I don't have to live with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The purity tests are so exhausting

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    They’re the ones foisting their requirements on others. Somebody shares what they do, and the purists come storming in with their righteous condescension. Nobody asked for that negativity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    In this case, your assessment is fair - user is harsh, name-calls, and does talk down to the person they were responding to/the reader. I got lost in the chain.

    Regardless, accusations of purity testing come up more than enough online for my liking and it isn't always in response to righteous condescension, as you aptly described the user's behavior in this example.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments