you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I read their responses. I don’t understand how Star Trek Enterprise relates to Me Too and being a “Man’s Man” Star Trek. What are they trying to say?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 30 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    As much as "Me Too" was supposed to be about ridding the industry of sexual harassment (and worse), it also had knock-on effects in terms of storytelling, cast composition, etc.

    I don't think it's controversial to say that "Enterprise" was not terribly progressive by modern standards (or, in my opinion, the standards of the time) when it came to female representation in particular.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    @ValueSubtracted @cybervseas

    By such standards, the Original Series (#TOS) seems positively regressive. I don't mean to defend this, but I'm guessing that, at the time, it was perceived that Enterprise needed to fit into that regression.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Hmm, I don't know about that. It seems less to me like them trying to "match" TOS, and more like a continuation of the trends established on late-period "Voyager"...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    @ValueSubtracted I recall noticing the sexism on Enterprise. I don't recall noticing it on Voyager, which had two strong female characters. But I'm an old man raised in a more chauvinistic era--I might not notice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Seven of Nine's suit was painted on

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I definitely noticed that.

    I think Janeway and 7 were well written. B'elana was mostly just angry.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    B’elana was mostly just angry.

    I don't remember shit about B'elana , or much of Voyager characterisation except :

    • Janeway : Hardass
    • Doctor : fun guy
    • Tuvok : generic serious vulcan
    • Neelix : obvious comic relief, silly
    • Chakotay : Native american guy with a cool face tat

    B'elana being mostly angry makes sense as a Klingon and an engineer. each facet isn't known for being sunshine on rainbows, combined, not exactly going to be a delight.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I read B'elana as a point that the chief engineer doesn't always need to be some composed nerd. Even a person with deep anger control issues, with interest in (Klingon) religion, can be a good fit for that position and can stand her ground to a literal Borg.

    Plus ofc Janeway + B'elana and + 7 later, meant that most science-related decision were made by a group of women.

    But as everyone on the cast, once 7 and doctor were out, the screentime was really compressed 😶

  • source
  • parent
  • I do recall that Enterprise was hyped as a response to the demands from (mostly male) fans who wanted a ‘return to exploration’, less ‘magic technology’ and implicitly ‘men doing stuff.’

    The 1990s BBS hate of the women in leadership roles in the early seasons of Voyager was savage.

  • source
  • parent