you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It would not make any sense for them to be upscaled on the fly. It's a computationally intensive operation, and storage space is cheap. Is there any evidence of it being done on the fly?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It would if they can do it on your device.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    While it could theoretically be done on device, it would require the device to have dedicated hardware that is capable of doing the processing, so it would only work on a limited number of devices. It would be pretty easy to test this if a known modified video were available.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    AI upscaling can be run on a ton of devices nowadays.

    Also people are forgetting it’s not just storage, it’s bandwidth they save with this move. So even if they store both the low and high res copies they can save 4x the bandwidth (or more) serving to devices with upscaling capabilities.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It’s not that computationally intensive to upscale frames. TVs have been doing it algorithmically for ages and looking good doing it. Hell, nVidia graphics cards can do it for every single frame of high end games with DLSS. Calling it “AI” because the type of algorithm it’s using is just cashing in on the buzzword.

    (Unless I’m misunderstanding what’s going on.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You are right that nvidia cards can do it for games using DLSS. Nvidia also has a version called RTX video that works for video. But are they could to be dedicating hardware for playback every single time a user requests to play a short? That is significantly different than just serving a file to the viewer. If they had all of these Nvidia cards laying around, they surely have better things that they could use them for. To be clear here, the ONLY thing I am taking issue with is a comment that it seems that youtube may be upscaling videos on the fly (as opposed to upscaling them once when they are uploaded, and then serving that file 1 million times). I'm simply saying that it makes a hell of a lot more sense any day of the week to upscale a file one time than to upscale it 1 million times.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    It would make sense if it's a scheme to inject ads directly into the stream so adblockers wouldn't work anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    They could do that without upscaling. Upscaling every video only fly would cost an absolute shit ton of money, probably more than they would be making from the ad. There is no scenario where they wouldn't just upscale it one time and store it.

  • source
  • parent