you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"I've found a workaround"

Workaround (according to article): "First of all, YouTube Premium"

The actual workaround (according to article): "Two words: uBlock Origin. Yes, I know that Google has blocked it from its Chrome Extension store, but there is still a way to get uBlock Origin on Chrome"

Seems like they are being paid by Google. Actual workaround should be to drop Chrome.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    My thoughts exactly, what a heap of crap. Tom's Guide used to be one of the good ones out there, real shame.

    What I was wondering though is if they detect browser plugins through some public ID - how difficult is it to change those? In Firefox it's absolutely trivial, you can simply download the extension, open it as a zip file, and then edit the files inside with a text editor and change the ID.

    Haven't used chrome for years, but extensions used to be javascript files just as well, so I doubt they are that hard to edit. Unless they found a way to block installations from local files and enforce their shop, no idea if that's a thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    if they detect browser plugins through some public ID - how difficult is it to change those?

    I actually dismissed that one from the get go since there is not confirmation of any mechanism they described in the article. Not going to spend time on technical-looking explanations from someone who calls a whole another extension a "workaround". Might as well be the case of broken or outdated filters in ABP.

    I'm sure if some major site finds a way to know your extensions we'll see some major unsolvable issues.

  • source
  • parent