912
European Commission has a "Wifi4EU" initative, provides 93k high-speed private access points across the EU, free of charge. (slrpnk.net)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by to c/technology@lemmy.world
171 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/25779751

The intative promises to be privacy-friendly with no tracking. Stating:

Your privacy is important. The WiFi4EU app ensures a private online experience with no tracking or data collection. Simply connect and enjoy free public Wi-Fi without concerns.

Source: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/wifi4eu-citizens

Will be interesting to see how this spans and plays out in reality. Looks promising too, did a quick scan of their builtin permissions and trackers and looks good too. (Scanning tool is called Exodus)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 24 points 1 year ago (4 children)

HTTPS is used on virtually every site out there these days. That is used to encrypt your traffic from the get go. So specifics of the traffic/request won't be obvious/known. The EU could be big enough to force manufacturers to inject their certificates into devices... could be a man in the middle attack. But you can always just remove certs you don't trust from your devices.

DNS by default is often plaintext. You can setup your device to use DoH or other encrypted versions of DNS.

That leaves just the raw connection analysis... eg, that your device is sending traffic to some known IP... many site share hosts so that can be hard to determine though often not really... Proxy or VPN services can make it impossible to do this type of analysis... but then those services will be able to tell.

Ultimately being able to say that "Shalafi sent some packets to an IP that google owns and received a bunch back" could be email... could be youtube... could be any number of things... at some point it become educated guess at best. And what specifically happened (ex: Watched a video about tying shoes) is simply unknown. It would take a bunch of external additional data to actually tie you to anything directly, eg server logs or other sources... which usually means more than one party is already working together against you. At that point you've got bigger issues usually.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    this is such an oversimplification. maybe it's hard to distinguish between google services, but if you play some online game, chat over whatsapp or signal, or have a voip call, that's an entirely different story. these can probably be told apart by DNS requests or active connections, and in the case of communications, messaging and voice calling is obvious to tell apart because of the difference in the volume of data. when having a voip call, through a service that supports peer to peer calls (most do, and it's default on), an observer may even be able to deduct something about who you are speaking with, like what general area they live at.

    then what if you have apps that try to establish connections to services at home. like smb or nfs, https services. your smb/nfs client may leak your credentials, I think even linux does not encrypt smb communication unless you request it in a mount option, and with HTTPS you leak your internal domain names because of TLS SNI.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Forgive me for not covering 100% of this advanced topic in my 3 paragraphs on Lemmy... Nuance gets long, and most people have attention spans of a squirrel.

    maybe it’s hard to distinguish between google services, but if you play some online game, chat over whatsapp or signal, or have a voip call, that’s an entirely different story.

    Already covered as

    That leaves just the raw connection analysis…

    Where specifics can't be divined... but other details might.

    these can probably be told apart by DNS requests

    Addressed already with

    DNS by default is often plaintext. You can setup your device to use DoH or other encrypted versions of DNS.

    when having a voip call, through a service that supports peer to peer calls (most do, and it’s default on), an observer may even be able to deduct something about who you are speaking with, like what general area they live at.

    Actually this is quite unlikely. ASNs are not as structured as you think. It takes an external database that specifically tracks DHCP'd ISP addresses. Case in point, when I moved to my new house... Google maps though I was a good 60 miles away from where I was... it was after repeated access to google maps and other service for about a month before maps started getting accurate with where I'm accessing their service from.

    And that point is covered with

    It would take a bunch of external additional data to actually tie you to anything directly, eg server logs or other sources… which usually means more than one party is already working together against you. At that point you’ve got bigger issues usually.

    then what if you have apps that try to establish connections to services at home.

    If you purposefully steer your car off the road... of course you're going to crash. If you're going to expose non-encrypted things onto the internet...

    At that point you’ve got bigger issues usually.

    I would suspect the untrusted wifi to NOT be the leading thing you'd want to care about in this situation. But even then... I would start making reasonable assumptions such as you're likely on a DHCP connection without static addressing... your site and resources will rotate IPs every once in a while. Makes tracking you even harder.

    with HTTPS you leak your internal domain names because of TLS SNI.

    Encrypted SNI (ESNI) / Encrypted Client Hello (ECH) exists... Cloudflare for example supports ECH, and they transit a LOT of data.

    But once again... would be outside of the scope of discussion here. Yes... an ISP can make an educated guess of where you're likely to be going... and maybe even make a reasonable guess of what you could doing... But certainly not the details of it.

    And this all ignores the fact that a random coffee shop isn't going to do full packet inspection to get this data to begin with. It's not worth it for them. They gain very little from collecting meta data without some bigger company backing them to do so... Which falls under

    It would take a bunch of external additional data to actually tie you to anything directly, eg server logs or other sources… which usually means more than one party is already working together against you. At that point you’ve got bigger issues usually.

    Edit: Typo that changed meaning. Fixed.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Forgive me for not covering 100% of this advanced topic in my 3 paragraphs on Lemmy...

    Quite obviously the problem is not that you did not write an 560 page essay, but that you were misleading by basically saying "nah, it's fine, nothing could leak, everything is ultra secure nowadays".

    If you purposefully steer your car off the road... of course you're going to crash. If you're going to expose non-encrypted things onto the internet...

    did you just ignore a whole lot of points here? DNS, SNI? smb clients? whatever else? its not like I'm using HTTP. things are largely encrypted, the rest is out of reach!

    Encrypted SNI (ESNI) / Encrypted Client Hello (ECH) exists... Cloudflare for example supports ECH, and they transit a LOT of data.

    how many sites exactly support that configuration? do you need additional configuration for that in e.g. nginx? if so, most selfhosters probably don't have it, because it's talked about almost nowhere.

    and is it finally enabled by default in firefox? will firefox just retry without encryption when the connection fails?

    But once again... would be outside of the scope of discussion here. Yes... an ISP can make an educated guess of where you're likely to be going... and maybe even make a reasonable guess of what you could doing... But certainly not the details of it.

    it is certainly in scope. the discussion is not about security and your accounts getting hacked by evil EU, but privacy and data mining, for which all of these is a treasure trove.

    And this all ignores the fact that a random coffee shop isn't going to do full packet inspection to get this data to begin with. It's not worth it for them.

    probably not the coffee shop but the networking equipment, where even cheaper models include some form of "smart cloud security"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •