Whenever a technology has increased productivity, the extra profit made hasn’t been passed on to increase the workers’ real wages. Why would it?
Where did you read this? It certainly did in the past:

It stopped when a combination of the mining boom taking off, Australia being too expensive to be a manufacturing hub anymore and it's difficult to measure how many widgets we make when the widgets are hard to measure according to:
spoiler
This article by Ian Verrender examines the concept of productivity in Australia and challenges the common narrative that our productivity is in crisis.
Key points:
Misunderstanding Productivity: Many people, especially in business, confuse productivity (output per unit of input) with profitability and offer simplistic solutions like cutting red tape and lowering taxes without fully understanding the issue or measuring it accurately.
Wage Growth's Role: Contrary to common belief, stagnant wages growth isn't necessarily bad for productivity. Higher wages incentivize efficiency improvements and labor-saving technology (as seen in Australia's historical shift from agriculture to manufacturing/services), which wouldn't happen with suppressed wages.
Productivity Measurement Challenges: Measuring productivity is difficult, particularly in service-based economies like Australia's. It's hard to quantify output accurately for sectors like education or healthcare. This makes interpreting statistics and identifying true trends complex.
The Mining Boom Effect: Periods of high mineral prices (like the GFC aftermath and pandemic years) can appear to lower productivity figures, not because the economy is less efficient, but because mining companies become profitable digging harder-to-reach resources, taking more time and labor per unit. This isn't necessarily a sign of economic decline.
Investment, Not Just Taxes: While tax cuts might increase profits, they don't automatically lead to investment in productivity-enhancing equipment or techniques unless coupled with wage growth that makes such investment viable for businesses. Encouraging investment through targeted incentives could be more effective.
Complexity and Interconnectedness: Economic issues are complex. Solutions often have unintended consequences. The author questions the practicality of drastically changing policies (like abandoning mining) to achieve potentially easier-to-measure productivity figures, suggesting a deeper analysis is needed instead of assuming a simple fix exists.
In essence, Verrender argues that Australia shouldn't be in a panic about productivity, that wage growth isn't inherently bad, measurement methods are flawed for our service economy, and the mining boom's impact is often misinterpreted. He suggests focusing on encouraging genuine investment rather than relying solely on tax cuts or wage restraint.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-27/productivity-wages-growth-australia-mining-boom/105338488
removing jobs through automation could be a great thing if we had a market capable of retraining those workers to perform the jobs that society needs most
Maybe we should use AI to train them :D