you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 23 points 1 year ago (13 children)

There is a lot of malpractice going on in traffic engineering (I say as a person trained as a traffic engineer). In a sane world, the engineer of record would lose his license for this sort of shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    That's not an engineer thing that's a law thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (8 children)

    Who do you think writes the MUTCD, deciding which signage and road markings carry the force of law and which don't (i.e. which are 'regulatory' and which are 'advisory')? Who do you think decides to use a particular type of signage and marking in a particular situation?

    This was 100% on the engineer, who specified a design inappropriate for the situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    ... If you think engineers make laws....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Do you have the air of a confidently incorrect Redditor garbage person?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    What he's saying is "the traffic engineers decided to use a flashing yellow indicator, which means nothing and carries no legal force, over a traditional stoplight or flashing red, which would require yielding." Intersections, like every mile of roadway, are designed and signed off on somewhere by some engineer.

  • source
  • parent