you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

This is a strong argument. One of my main complaints with modern large companies is the need to operate for short term gains long term losses, so point number 3 sounds amazing to me. Does this mean Intel would no longer be a publicly traded company, but a US Government owned company, something similar to the USPS?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    It depends on how Intel is rescued: whether the government nationalizes it completely to become a state-owned company, partial rescue of the company to structure it, conventional rescue, or whether it is placed under federal guardianship for a time and then privatized.

    In short, yes, but in certain scenarios.

  • source
  • parent