▲ 1344 ▼ its even more outdated (lemmy.dbzer0.com) submitted 3 years ago by covert_czar@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/memes@lemmy.ml 409 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Octopus1348 4 points 3 years ago (3 children) Me too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] snowe@programming.dev -2 points 3 years ago (2 children) Same. I hate all these messaging apps people use. Unless you need security, then just use the one your phone already has. Otherwise use signal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MiddledAgedGuy@beehaw.org 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Signal is centralized and requires a phone number. This is potentially impactful to your anonymity. So, for example if the recipients device is comprised that encryption doesn't mean much and you may be identifiable. All that said, I use Signal. But it's good to know it's shortcomings. Edit: added potentially. You could certainly have a number not associated with your identity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago anonymity, privacy, and security are not inclusive of the other and anonymity is not in scope of signal. SimpleX would be a better option if that's your goal, although being in beta still, I can't fully recommend it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] snowe@programming.dev -2 points 3 years ago (2 children) Same. I hate all these messaging apps people use. Unless you need security, then just use the one your phone already has. Otherwise use signal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MiddledAgedGuy@beehaw.org 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Signal is centralized and requires a phone number. This is potentially impactful to your anonymity. So, for example if the recipients device is comprised that encryption doesn't mean much and you may be identifiable. All that said, I use Signal. But it's good to know it's shortcomings. Edit: added potentially. You could certainly have a number not associated with your identity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago anonymity, privacy, and security are not inclusive of the other and anonymity is not in scope of signal. SimpleX would be a better option if that's your goal, although being in beta still, I can't fully recommend it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MiddledAgedGuy@beehaw.org 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Signal is centralized and requires a phone number. This is potentially impactful to your anonymity. So, for example if the recipients device is comprised that encryption doesn't mean much and you may be identifiable. All that said, I use Signal. But it's good to know it's shortcomings. Edit: added potentially. You could certainly have a number not associated with your identity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago anonymity, privacy, and security are not inclusive of the other and anonymity is not in scope of signal. SimpleX would be a better option if that's your goal, although being in beta still, I can't fully recommend it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago anonymity, privacy, and security are not inclusive of the other and anonymity is not in scope of signal. SimpleX would be a better option if that's your goal, although being in beta still, I can't fully recommend it permalink fedilink source parent
