585
Robbing Delivery Robots Is Now a Thing (www.autoweek.com)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
164 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 109 points 3 years ago (31 children)

Fix poverty and you fix a huge amount of other things.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 31 child comments
    •
  • [–] 79 points 3 years ago (13 children)

    Ok sure, but have we considered arming the robots with assault rifles instead?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
    •
  • [–] 29 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    The article mentioned tear gas canisters be equipped instead. I can't wait for a delivery robot to be near my property, someone tries to mess with it and gets gassed, then I get to enjoy tear gas as well from my front porch.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 30 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Or some kid walks past it, bumps it slightly and gets gassed in the face.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I'm assuming the canisters would only be released if the door is forced open. I highly doubt it's going to activate a few slightly knock it I mean hell, those things drive into lamp posts on occasion.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    With the care and attention tech companies give to the safety of their devices, I can definitely see it spraying someone unintended. Probably even the person it was delivering to. Any company sensible enough to properly implement this likely will finder better less potentially dangerous solutions to the problem. This idea stinks of someone who gave it 5 minutes of thought and wants it implemented as quickly as possible.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [+] -40 points 3 years ago (14 children)

    How's that related? A criminal is a criminal, their wealth is irrelevant.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 29 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    Because fixing poverty lowers criminality.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [+] -42 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    Ahaha! Right, sure!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Good point. It's the poorest cities and neighborhoods that have the lowest crime rate. Forgot about that, thanks for educating.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    It's the poorest countries which have lower crime rates. You people are lunatics.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [+] 10 points 3 years ago (4 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [+] -14 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Lick as much as you wish, I won't judge.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •