▲ 970 ▼ Today, the Mexican Government introduced its new chocolate bar, priced at less than $1USD. Made of 50% cocoa, powdered milk, vanilla. No refined sugar, no artificial flavourings. (files.catbox.moe) submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world 261 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Well, depends on if the advertising matches the product. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) I mean, they list the ingredients and percentages. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago (3 children) They list what they claim are the ingredients and percentages. They're also the state. Who is going to fine them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Yup realize the state isn't making them, right? It's a partnership/subsidization with one of the food companies that handles welfare foods. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) If the state stands to profit from the relationship the distinction is meaningless beyond muttering about the merger of state and corporate power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 point 1 year ago How are they profiting? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) I mean, they list the ingredients and percentages. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago (3 children) They list what they claim are the ingredients and percentages. They're also the state. Who is going to fine them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Yup realize the state isn't making them, right? It's a partnership/subsidization with one of the food companies that handles welfare foods. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) If the state stands to profit from the relationship the distinction is meaningless beyond muttering about the merger of state and corporate power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 point 1 year ago How are they profiting? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago (3 children) They list what they claim are the ingredients and percentages. They're also the state. Who is going to fine them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Yup realize the state isn't making them, right? It's a partnership/subsidization with one of the food companies that handles welfare foods. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) If the state stands to profit from the relationship the distinction is meaningless beyond muttering about the merger of state and corporate power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 point 1 year ago How are they profiting? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Yup realize the state isn't making them, right? It's a partnership/subsidization with one of the food companies that handles welfare foods. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) If the state stands to profit from the relationship the distinction is meaningless beyond muttering about the merger of state and corporate power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 point 1 year ago How are they profiting? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) If the state stands to profit from the relationship the distinction is meaningless beyond muttering about the merger of state and corporate power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 point 1 year ago How are they profiting? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 point 1 year ago How are they profiting? permalink fedilink source parent