▲ 726 ▼ Kash Patel Is Polygraphing FBI Staff to Find Out if They’re Being Mean About Him (www.thedailybeast.com) submitted 1 year ago by empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world 99 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/32819644
[–] toppy@lemy.lol 37 points 1 year ago (4 children) Is polygraph test reliable ? Doesn't it fall under pseudoscience ? permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 36 points 1 year ago (1 child) It is not reliable at all, and yes, it is widely considered to be psuedoscience. Yes, this is a batshit insane scenario permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago* Yes, morons still believe in it, yes, he is a moron. That and just looking for an excuse. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Peer@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) You can even train to beat them, so it’s definitely not a reliable method. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) And, I would assume, if anyone had done that training it would be FBI agents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago Lol right? This seems more like a "can you beat a polygraph test" test, than a loyalty test permalink fedilink source parent [–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago It measures things accurately but this has absolutely nothing to do with identifying if someone is telling the truth or not. permalink fedilink source parent [+] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 8 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 36 points 1 year ago (1 child) It is not reliable at all, and yes, it is widely considered to be psuedoscience. Yes, this is a batshit insane scenario permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago* Yes, morons still believe in it, yes, he is a moron. That and just looking for an excuse. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago* Yes, morons still believe in it, yes, he is a moron. That and just looking for an excuse. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Peer@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) You can even train to beat them, so it’s definitely not a reliable method. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) And, I would assume, if anyone had done that training it would be FBI agents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago Lol right? This seems more like a "can you beat a polygraph test" test, than a loyalty test permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) And, I would assume, if anyone had done that training it would be FBI agents. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago Lol right? This seems more like a "can you beat a polygraph test" test, than a loyalty test permalink fedilink source parent
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago Lol right? This seems more like a "can you beat a polygraph test" test, than a loyalty test permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago It measures things accurately but this has absolutely nothing to do with identifying if someone is telling the truth or not. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 8 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent