this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
833 points (96.2% liked)

World News

32289 readers
794 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But the mice genetically predisposed to getting tumors got tumors. What more proof do you need?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's official: Cancer causes cancer.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

One step closer cancer causing mice

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fun fact. A potential side effect of many cancer treatments is... cancer

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

just gotta hope it kills the old cancer before it gives you a new cancer

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How hecking cancerous cancer is?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago