Businessinsider.com

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

Maybe the second candidate was s*** and nobody wanted to vote for them? Or maybe voters really only wanted the one person.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Or, and I think this is more likely, people are used to the idea of marking more than one name invalidating the ballot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    You think that's more likely huh? But somehow only in those two heavily minority districts? What are you basing that on?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    I don't think it's just in those minority districts. The article states that it's WORSE in those districts, that doesn't mean it's not a problem elsewhere.

    Maybe they need to put "Vote for Two" in bold or a bigger font or something. Like I said at the top, it's hard to tell without seeing the ballot design.

  • source
  • parent