you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 93 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm pretty sure this supreme court would rule that people don't have a right to electricity, or even water. They'll probably be totally ok with people losing internet access as punishment for crossing media owners.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    or even water

    Already did.

    We never stopped the “lol treaties with Native American tribes don’t count” bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    Besides your point but this is the aspect about Gorsuch that I can't seem to make internally consistent. He almost always rules in terms of native rights – even when, I think, it stretches his supposed originalist guiding principle – yet is more than happy to rule as a conservative on all other times and support "industry" and big business (even when it stretches his supposed originalist guiding principle).

    I know that nothing necessitates a person to act logically and most act from emotion, more than anything, but most people, I find, have a relative reason they think they're being logically consistent but I can't seem to suss even that out, with regards to him.

  • source
  • parent