you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 10 points 1 year ago (9 children)

This post is vying for most reposted article on Lemmy

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

    Yea cause Lemmy users have a hard on for Linux and anything and everything Microsoft = terrible lmao its truly fun to read these comments at least.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Well. It is objectively true that everything Microsoft is in fact terrible

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Yea they are so terrible they are market leaders with trillion dollar cap, absolutely the worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The mistake you are making is conflating profitability and quality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    No the mistake yall are making is ignoring if a product was truly bad then EVERYONE would abandon it but they don't been doing IT for 2 decades windows is going no where.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Microsoft has very, very good salespeople and they let the sunk cost fallacy do the rest. Their products donโ€™t have to be good. They just have to check certain boxes for sales and be recognizable, especially since so many people/businesses are genuinely unaware that alternatives exist, or think that (due to marketing and sunk cost fallacy) those are alternatives are โ€œtoo complicatedโ€ or โ€œtoo risky.โ€

    MS has been using aggressive anti-competitive practices for decades to secure and hold market share. Making good things that people genuinely enjoy is not part of their business plan.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment