you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 80 points 3 years ago (4 children)

I'm not saying he meant anti-union by that line, but that's classic anti-union line saying my employees don't need unions.

Very much in line of "unions means less money for you" statement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 78 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Yeah the whole "I love unions, but we at this company are a family so we don't need that", is peak anti-union talk. Throughout history it's been used by people who are horrible to their employees.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago

    Exactly. If I was really concerned about my employees etc. I would want them to have a union with power that could match mine to argue their needs and concerns. If he had a union a lot of these problems and mistakes that he's having likely wouldn't have occurred.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    True. If he said that line in response to a statement about wages. I can't say that I exactly remember the context in which he made that statement, but I believe that it (ironically, given this post) had more to do with workplace culture than wages.

  • source
  • parent