I dont think its insensitive, but I do think you're missing the forest for the trees a bit with this part

the greatest enemy... is division itself

This was sortof poorly communicated on my part because its such a long winded concept but basically my original comment was an acknowledgement that the division was indeed the enemy but more specifically that the ruling class and those in power have consciously and intentionally placed these divisions with deadly accuracy in order to protect the meta interests at play.

For example, libya was a country in Africa mostly useless to america and had no real geopolitical weight in the global arena. When Syria sent suicide bombers to take down a commercial airliner the american government commited to a worldwide obfuscation of this fact because they were collaborating with Syria in military actions against other countries in the Middle East and needed to keep their appearance of impropriety at bay while they were publicly allied. So, at the behest of the american government, libya took credit for the bombings in order to create confusion around the investigation which was very clearly showing no evidence of Libyan involvement and extensive evidence of Syrian involvement. The original reporting of the bombing accused Syria of being the perpetrator, but due to America's pressure campaign the findings were decried as inconclusive.

Decades later, while Syria was committing a genocide and no longer a public ally of the US, libya once again became a subject of the spotlight. Why? Because america was welcoming them into their alliance of course. Libya had "given up their WMD's" (which they never even remotely came close to having) in exchange for being brought into the fold to fight the "evil regimes of the middle east."

Now, one might wonder at this point: what about libya changed in those intervening decades? The leader of their terrorist state was a dictator named qadaffi, and the noble nation joining the coalition was lead by.. the same guy. Objectively nothing about their government or country had changed except the fact that america now saw them useful to their perception management operations.

This is, again, a very poorly explained way of saying that what you percieve as division are actually carefully crafted splinters deliberately used to shatter the ability of anyone to accurately understand and describe the world around them. We are so constantly bombarded with sci-fi level propaganda and unconscious manipulation of narratives about the world around us that almost none of the things that divide people are even real in the first place.

Anti abortion politics was a manufactured astroturfed movement thought up by the highest levels of government and society in order to force a fascist resurgence within the country to destabilize the working class. The tea party movement was a manufactured astroturfed movement funded by billionaires in order to foment a fascist resurgence within the country to destabilize the working class. Illegal immigration is a direct result of american foreign policy destabilizing governments around the world and creating refugee crises that are so large no other country could afford to absorb them and the anti immigration panic is a manufactured astroturfed movement designed by the highest levels of conservative power structures to manufacture consent for holocaust style death camps. These are all factually proven right wing psyops that have successfully destabilized the country and created all the division that is so visibly causing our society to collapse.

In all of these scenarios, there are specific actors and groups directly responsible for and consciously in control of the supposed divisions no matter what they may be. Left or right is a burlap sack over your head that you cannot remove but can turn 180 degrees in between waterboardings. Take the sack off and look at who's holding the hose. It's capitalists every time. Doing something that is inherently destructive to society and the world at large specifically with the intent of profiting off the now destabilized workers, state, or country.

This is long enough so I'll try to wrap up. The real solution to divisions in society is by reducing inequality and the way to reduce inequality is by forcibly divesting capitalists from their capital and returning it to the people who produced it. All the divisions, all the wars, all the economic failures come from a single point and their entire game for the past 400 years has been to obfuscate that single point behind an led screen of shiny new things to get mad about instead of the people exploiting all of us for their own gain.

(The reference to libya is an example given in the documentary "hypernomalization" by Adam Curtis if you'd ever like to hear the story unfucked by my frantic desire to get this comment out lol Here's the link if you're interested )

I agree with all your predictions and the geopolitical risks you mention, but as far as I'm concerned, you're cool. All around the world, everyone is ruled and bossed around by horrible people. Yours just happen to have bigger guns and the gold standard for central bank reserve currencies. I don't think it's fair to consider every single person that lives in a country/empire/whatever a bad human being or someone who deserves bad things, no matter how horrible the empire in its collective efforts.

You guys have good valuable people. I've had the fortune to meet a few and stay friends with them. I'm sure this is true for even the most perverse organizations. Some people are just there cause they didn't have any better alternatives.

The value of someone is a case by case basis thing as far as I'm concerned. There's no passport that skips the line to condemnation or salvation.

I figure it's just like in poker, you know? The cards we have, we got dealt. The question isn't why didn't we get the hand we wanted, or how could we redesign the game in order for everyone to get good cards... The game will be over by then. Only thing that matters is how we play what we're dealt.

And yes, I realize the cards both of us might get very soon might be very bad, but I guess i'd rather see if I can make some kind of play with whatever I have and have fun with the other people around me than endlessly grieve about the ones I wanted or the people that stopped me from getting em.

Much love, my friend. It's not your fault and nothing is the end of the world (believe it or not, not even the end of the world). You have nothing to apologize for that you didn't personally do freely and knowingly, and even if you have those, everyone does and most are less reflexive about it. Stay strong.