159
Wait... what? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

2nd one is 18-5 not 2. Looks like in the initial equation they forgot to carry the one, probably because it'd make the label look stupider than it already is.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Theyre all wrong intentionally.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Whoops. Not that it mattered much as [@[email protected] pointed out, but thanks for correcting me nonetheless.

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
159 points (98.2% liked)

Funny

10183 readers
2266 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS