you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It's sarcasm. The question asks for unwarranted precision and the response is a joke.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Imagining a guy who asks me a dumb question so I can let everyone know how I'd mock them with a joke answer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Spot on, yeah. Although as pointed out just above, this wasn't actually Weizenbaum's position. But in an era of letters to the editor, perhaps using a little rhetorical trickery to preempt a two-month-long back and forth might be excusable. It's a strawman nonetheless; but this letter is a screed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I suspect he got asked it a lot. There was a lot of interesting work going on back then but people basically didn't have any notion that there was a path from there to any kind of AGI. (In that respect they might've been somewhat more clued up than Altman.)

    I think it's a natural thing to preemptively defend against the obvious counterpoint when you're railing against the thesis that current AI work isn't going to deliver on the "I".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment