As simple as possible to summarize the best way you can, first, please. Feel free to expand after, or just say whatever you want lol. Honest question.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

That is an assumption that it never didn't, not a proof. What are you even doing here?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You seem to have a problem with my belief, and just generally how science works but it can be remedied

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I have a problem with you acting smarter than you are, not your beliefs, and no I don't have a problem with how science works. You're the one who's claiming it's something different than it is. I'm not responding after this comment, but you don't have the information you think you do. I think that's an issue for you for some reason, but it's perfectly fine to not know things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago

    Ok so burden of proof is on the one telling any story, then reality itself must adhere to, or challenge that or it's just a correct assumption? Also note that nobody else is allowed to have any other belief or facts to challenge the story because "nobody can know anything about anything"? It's like the debating technique of a narcissist

  • source
  • parent