▲ 940 ▼ It would appear lemmy.world has blocked this community (sh.itjust.works) submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by Madbrad200@sh.itjust.works to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 385 comments fedilink hide all child comments !piracy@lemmy.ml has also been blocked from lemmy.world. edit: Lemmy.world has released an official response.
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That's true. The reasons given were unsatisfyingly vague. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Like, I think people are upset about blocking the piracy communities, sure, but I think that the real issue is that it feels like everyone is just vibing, doing their thing on their lemmy instances, then this troll comes in all fake concerned about breaking rules, gets utterly piled on naturally, only for the admins in question to come in and "side" with the "loser" in people's eyes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) Yeah, I agree with that. It's not the blocking that's such an issue, it's how they came to decide to do it. Definitely wasn't handled well. I wonder if the (even more) downtime they've been having recently is a result of more people being pissed about this move piling on to the DDOS attacks? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) If they had decided to do this a week earlier I doubt it would be this controversial. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Why's that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) I mentioned earlier or elsewhere on this thread that right now, the narrative that I'm aware of is as follows: Lemmy.world users: just vibing, doing their thing Concern troll: comes in with a freshly created account to pearl-clutch about scary illegal things Lemmy.world users: hahaha look at this loser downvotes them to oblivion, resumes vibing Lemmy.world Admins: Piracy?! OMG that's ILLEGAL, thank goodness someone pointed this out to us If they had an existing stance on piracy, they should have been already enforcing it. Then it wouldn't look like they were successfully spurred into action by a bad-faith actor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That narrative appears to be correct, although at the end I think it may have been more like "You know, now that this asshole mentions it, maybe we shouldn't host stuff from these piracy communities as Lemmy's largest instance. That might create problems for us down the road." They definitely should have been more transparent about why they chose to do it at this particular time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago “You know, now that this asshole mentions it, maybe we shouldn’t host stuff from these piracy communities as Lemmy’s largest instance. That might create problems for us down the road.” I'm almost certain that's what actually went down, but I'm explicitly referring to the issue of people's perception. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Like, I think people are upset about blocking the piracy communities, sure, but I think that the real issue is that it feels like everyone is just vibing, doing their thing on their lemmy instances, then this troll comes in all fake concerned about breaking rules, gets utterly piled on naturally, only for the admins in question to come in and "side" with the "loser" in people's eyes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) Yeah, I agree with that. It's not the blocking that's such an issue, it's how they came to decide to do it. Definitely wasn't handled well. I wonder if the (even more) downtime they've been having recently is a result of more people being pissed about this move piling on to the DDOS attacks? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) If they had decided to do this a week earlier I doubt it would be this controversial. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Why's that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) I mentioned earlier or elsewhere on this thread that right now, the narrative that I'm aware of is as follows: Lemmy.world users: just vibing, doing their thing Concern troll: comes in with a freshly created account to pearl-clutch about scary illegal things Lemmy.world users: hahaha look at this loser downvotes them to oblivion, resumes vibing Lemmy.world Admins: Piracy?! OMG that's ILLEGAL, thank goodness someone pointed this out to us If they had an existing stance on piracy, they should have been already enforcing it. Then it wouldn't look like they were successfully spurred into action by a bad-faith actor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That narrative appears to be correct, although at the end I think it may have been more like "You know, now that this asshole mentions it, maybe we shouldn't host stuff from these piracy communities as Lemmy's largest instance. That might create problems for us down the road." They definitely should have been more transparent about why they chose to do it at this particular time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago “You know, now that this asshole mentions it, maybe we shouldn’t host stuff from these piracy communities as Lemmy’s largest instance. That might create problems for us down the road.” I'm almost certain that's what actually went down, but I'm explicitly referring to the issue of people's perception. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) Yeah, I agree with that. It's not the blocking that's such an issue, it's how they came to decide to do it. Definitely wasn't handled well. I wonder if the (even more) downtime they've been having recently is a result of more people being pissed about this move piling on to the DDOS attacks? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) If they had decided to do this a week earlier I doubt it would be this controversial. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Why's that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) I mentioned earlier or elsewhere on this thread that right now, the narrative that I'm aware of is as follows: Lemmy.world users: just vibing, doing their thing Concern troll: comes in with a freshly created account to pearl-clutch about scary illegal things Lemmy.world users: hahaha look at this loser downvotes them to oblivion, resumes vibing Lemmy.world Admins: Piracy?! OMG that's ILLEGAL, thank goodness someone pointed this out to us If they had an existing stance on piracy, they should have been already enforcing it. Then it wouldn't look like they were successfully spurred into action by a bad-faith actor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That narrative appears to be correct, although at the end I think it may have been more like "You know, now that this asshole mentions it, maybe we shouldn't host stuff from these piracy communities as Lemmy's largest instance. That might create problems for us down the road." They definitely should have been more transparent about why they chose to do it at this particular time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago “You know, now that this asshole mentions it, maybe we shouldn’t host stuff from these piracy communities as Lemmy’s largest instance. That might create problems for us down the road.” I'm almost certain that's what actually went down, but I'm explicitly referring to the issue of people's perception. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) If they had decided to do this a week earlier I doubt it would be this controversial. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Why's that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) I mentioned earlier or elsewhere on this thread that right now, the narrative that I'm aware of is as follows: Lemmy.world users: just vibing, doing their thing Concern troll: comes in with a freshly created account to pearl-clutch about scary illegal things Lemmy.world users: hahaha look at this loser downvotes them to oblivion, resumes vibing Lemmy.world Admins: Piracy?! OMG that's ILLEGAL, thank goodness someone pointed this out to us If they had an existing stance on piracy, they should have been already enforcing it. Then it wouldn't look like they were successfully spurred into action by a bad-faith actor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That narrative appears to be correct, although at the end I think it may have been more like "You know, now that this asshole mentions it, maybe we shouldn't host stuff from these piracy communities as Lemmy's largest instance. That might create problems for us down the road." They definitely should have been more transparent about why they chose to do it at this particular time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago “You know, now that this asshole mentions it, maybe we shouldn’t host stuff from these piracy communities as Lemmy’s largest instance. That might create problems for us down the road.” I'm almost certain that's what actually went down, but I'm explicitly referring to the issue of people's perception. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) Why's that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) I mentioned earlier or elsewhere on this thread that right now, the narrative that I'm aware of is as follows: Lemmy.world users: just vibing, doing their thing Concern troll: comes in with a freshly created account to pearl-clutch about scary illegal things Lemmy.world users: hahaha look at this loser downvotes them to oblivion, resumes vibing Lemmy.world Admins: Piracy?! OMG that's ILLEGAL, thank goodness someone pointed this out to us If they had an existing stance on piracy, they should have been already enforcing it. Then it wouldn't look like they were successfully spurred into action by a bad-faith actor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That narrative appears to be correct, although at the end I think it may have been more like "You know, now that this asshole mentions it, maybe we shouldn't host stuff from these piracy communities as Lemmy's largest instance. That might create problems for us down the road." They definitely should have been more transparent about why they chose to do it at this particular time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago “You know, now that this asshole mentions it, maybe we shouldn’t host stuff from these piracy communities as Lemmy’s largest instance. That might create problems for us down the road.” I'm almost certain that's what actually went down, but I'm explicitly referring to the issue of people's perception. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) I mentioned earlier or elsewhere on this thread that right now, the narrative that I'm aware of is as follows: Lemmy.world users: just vibing, doing their thing Concern troll: comes in with a freshly created account to pearl-clutch about scary illegal things Lemmy.world users: hahaha look at this loser downvotes them to oblivion, resumes vibing Lemmy.world Admins: Piracy?! OMG that's ILLEGAL, thank goodness someone pointed this out to us If they had an existing stance on piracy, they should have been already enforcing it. Then it wouldn't look like they were successfully spurred into action by a bad-faith actor. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That narrative appears to be correct, although at the end I think it may have been more like "You know, now that this asshole mentions it, maybe we shouldn't host stuff from these piracy communities as Lemmy's largest instance. That might create problems for us down the road." They definitely should have been more transparent about why they chose to do it at this particular time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago “You know, now that this asshole mentions it, maybe we shouldn’t host stuff from these piracy communities as Lemmy’s largest instance. That might create problems for us down the road.” I'm almost certain that's what actually went down, but I'm explicitly referring to the issue of people's perception. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That narrative appears to be correct, although at the end I think it may have been more like "You know, now that this asshole mentions it, maybe we shouldn't host stuff from these piracy communities as Lemmy's largest instance. That might create problems for us down the road." They definitely should have been more transparent about why they chose to do it at this particular time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago “You know, now that this asshole mentions it, maybe we shouldn’t host stuff from these piracy communities as Lemmy’s largest instance. That might create problems for us down the road.” I'm almost certain that's what actually went down, but I'm explicitly referring to the issue of people's perception. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago “You know, now that this asshole mentions it, maybe we shouldn’t host stuff from these piracy communities as Lemmy’s largest instance. That might create problems for us down the road.” I'm almost certain that's what actually went down, but I'm explicitly referring to the issue of people's perception. permalink fedilink source parent
