you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 70 points 1 year ago (34 children)

An open source 2d printer is possible but will probably never happen

The print head is incredibly complex, the drivers and communications to talk to printers are all closed source, and unlike 3d printing the level of quality people are accustomed to is covered by patents for another 20-30 years

  • source
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    the drivers and communications to talk to printers are all closed source

    That hasn't stopped CUPS

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    just today I read that microsoft will stop accepting any new printer drivers. If new printers are to work, they must support mopria and IPP.

    That should eventually have positive side effects for us linux users

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    If I remember correctly, the restriction is that Microsoft will no longer distribute new print drivers via Windows Update. But I agree that moving to a common standard will help everyone’s print experience immensely. Trying to deal with HPs drivers is nightmare fuel.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    The print head is not complex, the printer companies just make it out to be. Essentially it's just a funnel to transfer ink onto paper. All that's needed is a needle to deliver the ink to the paper, or puncture the top layer to inject the ink to it. Apply heat to set the ink afterward. Moving the head over the paper and moving the rollers for the paper to move is already software which is known to the 3d printing community. The big trick is finding a system which doesn't hit some backward patent and getting a prototype made. That largely takes time and money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Most modern printers aren’t what you describe though, they’re either a piezo that flexes with electricity to create pressure on the ink chamber and release a precise droplet of ink or they are a thermal design where a resistor heats inside the ink chamber to create pressure that forces ink out of the nozzle and subsequently draws more ink into the chamber as it cools. Heat is used here to eject the ink but heat is not used to set the ink in either process, that is done with evaporation and absorption (which is why printing a full page image can smear).

    It’s not some big secret as you’ve said, the patents are openly available, but as you’ve said they’re off limits even for noncommercial use because America is stupid. It’s true that they’re not mystical and impossible to recreate but they’re definitely harder to replicate than a heat sink with a tube cut in it, a heat break, a cartridge heater, and a metal nozzle with a (typically) 0.4mm hole

    The print head in most inkjet printers (at least non commercial ones) has no moving parts (unless you count the piezo flexing). Dot matrix used needles but why recreate that unless you specifically want that for the vibes or something?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Don't overengineer the prototype. Make it simple and efficient as a jumping off platform to lead to further developments down the road. Any open printer project doesn't have to start with the technology the proprietary models have. They just have to be proof-of-concept that it's doable. Once that's proven, further developments can be made down the line. Dot matrix is easy to create and cheap to produce compared to the overengineered systems proprietary models use nowadays and it would work as a stepping stone toward that further development.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    That makes sense. If you’re going that route though you should be fairly safe patent wise I would think? Most of the dot matrix patents, if not all, have to be expired by now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    You would still need to explore patents. Just because patents exist, doesn't mean they are in use. I would not be surprised to find out that a company like HP would hunt down and buy any patents that could interfere with its profits just to prevent others from using them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    IANAL but I think patents don't necessarily mean open source isn't possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That is correct but it means it’s a lot of work for not much benefit

    3d printing took off in 2009 when the stratasys patents on FDM expired. You can literally look at the history of consumer 3d printing and it’s basically nothing nothing nothing nothing 2009 reprap makerbot prusa. Similarly when SLA patents expired we suddenly got formlabs and eventually cheap resin printers.

    Why reinvent the wheel? If a patent is about to expire just wait and do that. If it’s not and you truly have a novel idea for how to achieve the function that does not infringe on any patents, most people would end up trying to sell it (assuming they have the skill to bring it to market). Our culture is ruthless and requires capital to survive so I don’t necessarily fault someone for trying to secure the bag, though I wish they would at least do it in a way that wasn’t totally gross

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Are you saying the very concept of high resolution 2d printing is patented? Or that the way so and so manufacturer does it is patented?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    US patents expire after 20 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    obscenely expensive birth, no parental leave, no childcare support... it's a wonder they last that long.

    edit: now op changed parents to patents and i look like an idiot. let us make fun of your obvious typo

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    You can buy dedicates scanners who don't fuck with you.

    CANON PIXMA MG 2440 which I have also has full Linux support OOB without the bullshit, either print or scan. But it's an old boy now, it can't do the kewl ayy oo tee bullshit like LAN printing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Canon bricked 3 printers I owned. I will not own another canon. Love their cameras though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    How tf did canon brick them

    My shit is so ancient it has no idea what an "Internet" is. I'd like to see canon touch this mfer lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I had a printer that I used that was offline. It was accidentally put online and it bricked. My day had a printer that bricked when it became a little older. He bought the same one and it bricked immediately. It's planned obsolescence on the last 2.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment