A feeling should not be the reason you convert to any religion

My refute: it is always feelings, the alternative is science

you are wrong

Can you explain?

you are wrong to even ask

Then the other person stated how there is no logical argument, that you have to use "feelings" (explaining again the same refutal)

you can't expect to use science to explain

What we refer to then is feelings?

state my argument back at me to prove your faith, peasant

This is this discussion so far from my viewpoint. To add to that, I have to say also that it is clearly triggering for you and difficult to discuss. I don't mind but take a breather whenever. It makes for a better quality enlightenment.

( Small aside: The supposition that we don't use science in matters of theology and metaphysics is very important to examine. What do we use? )