(Please don't lob rocks at me. I love Python.)

Book cover: "Articifical Intelligence in BASIC" by Mike James
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It sure made sense forty years ago. And I'd bet that the examples in that book are more AI than today's LLMs.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    The dominant approach at the time were Expert Systems. This used a lot of carefully crafted data and manually curated facts that the inference engine can use. It also fit in a MUCH smaller footprint compared to conventional neural networks. But you also don't get real language processing, reasoning beyond the target problem domain, and stuff like that - it's laser focused and built on very small amounts of data. Much of the research from back then centers on using Lisp and Prolog of all things, so BASIC isn't a big stretch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments