▲ 481 ▼ If AI is so good at coding … where are the open source contributions? (pivot-to-ai.com) submitted 1 year ago by dgerard@awful.systems [M] to c/techtakes@awful.systems 364 comments fedilink hide all child comments Video version
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (4 children) No the fuck it's not Because it's a upscaled translation tech maybe? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] vivendi@programming.dev -4 points 1 year ago* (3 children) These views on LLMs are simplistic. As a wise man once said, "check yoself befo yo wreck yoself", I recommend more education thus LLM structures arw over hyped, but they're also not that simple permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago Yes you're right, it has some keyboard equivalent autocomplete as well. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) From what i know from recent articles about retracing LLM indepth, they are indeed best suited for language translation and perfectly explain the halucinations. And i think i've read somewhere that this was the originally intended purpose of the tech? Ah, here, and here more tabloid-ish. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 1 year ago many of the proponents of things in this field will propose/argue $x thing to be massively valuable for $x thing is, that doesn't often work out yes, there's some value in the tech for translation outcomes. to anyone even mildly online, "so are language teaching apps/sites using this?" is probably a very nearby question. and rightly so! and then when you go digging into how that's going in practice, wow fuck damn doesn't that Glorious AI Future sheen just fall right off... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vivendi@programming.dev -4 points 1 year ago* (3 children) These views on LLMs are simplistic. As a wise man once said, "check yoself befo yo wreck yoself", I recommend more education thus LLM structures arw over hyped, but they're also not that simple permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago Yes you're right, it has some keyboard equivalent autocomplete as well. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) From what i know from recent articles about retracing LLM indepth, they are indeed best suited for language translation and perfectly explain the halucinations. And i think i've read somewhere that this was the originally intended purpose of the tech? Ah, here, and here more tabloid-ish. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 1 year ago many of the proponents of things in this field will propose/argue $x thing to be massively valuable for $x thing is, that doesn't often work out yes, there's some value in the tech for translation outcomes. to anyone even mildly online, "so are language teaching apps/sites using this?" is probably a very nearby question. and rightly so! and then when you go digging into how that's going in practice, wow fuck damn doesn't that Glorious AI Future sheen just fall right off... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago Yes you're right, it has some keyboard equivalent autocomplete as well. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) From what i know from recent articles about retracing LLM indepth, they are indeed best suited for language translation and perfectly explain the halucinations. And i think i've read somewhere that this was the originally intended purpose of the tech? Ah, here, and here more tabloid-ish. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 1 year ago many of the proponents of things in this field will propose/argue $x thing to be massively valuable for $x thing is, that doesn't often work out yes, there's some value in the tech for translation outcomes. to anyone even mildly online, "so are language teaching apps/sites using this?" is probably a very nearby question. and rightly so! and then when you go digging into how that's going in practice, wow fuck damn doesn't that Glorious AI Future sheen just fall right off... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 1 year ago many of the proponents of things in this field will propose/argue $x thing to be massively valuable for $x thing is, that doesn't often work out yes, there's some value in the tech for translation outcomes. to anyone even mildly online, "so are language teaching apps/sites using this?" is probably a very nearby question. and rightly so! and then when you go digging into how that's going in practice, wow fuck damn doesn't that Glorious AI Future sheen just fall right off... permalink fedilink source parent