you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (13 children)

which is why we need anti piss-in-lemonade laws and limits on how much water there can be for a given number of lemons.

we don't need to remove capitalism, instead we can restrain it from harming people

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    Part of me agrees with you. The other part of me knows how well capitalism can pivot so much quicker than laws can be made to curtail the bad practices, that the system seems to be the issue. Maybe the government is the issue too, but it's a lot of bad faith companies that ruins the bunch. Forward thinking and progressive thinking with quick measured action could do it, but most people who are elected aren't capable of that or are too compromised to make anything work.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Regulation could keep capitalism in check.

    In reality capitalists use their money to make and change laws through lobbyists or bribes, and by propaganda through owning all media.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Not in reality, but in the US. Lobbying is called corruption elsewhere and is a crime. Don't put this shit on capitalism, it's a US only problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    it's a US only problem.

    Absolutely not. There more than enough lobbying and corruption in our all-so-democratic EU, just most of the population denying it based on "look how much worse the US is"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    we don't need to remove capitalism, instead we can restrain it from harming people

    That's what we've been telling ourselves for almost 200 years, and yet we are as we are...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I wanna be able to have private property though. I want that and laws that regulate corperations

    btw, actually good things have happened in the last 200 years too, along with bad ones

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I wanna be able to have private property though.

    Do you want a house to live on (Personal Property) or a house for which you charge rent (Private Property)?

    actually good things have happened in the last 200 years too.

    Many of those good things were "in spite of", not "because of" the system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Do you want a house to live on (Personal Property) or a house for which you charge rent (Private Property)?

    Both depending on my situation. If I want to live in an area for most of my life, I would want to buy a home. If I plan to stay there only for a few months renting makes more sense

    Also you call them personal and private property as if those are radically different, they are both owned by a non-govt entity.

    Many of those good things were “in spite of”, not “because of” the system

    You can just group all the good things as stuff done by actors outside of 'the system' in your head and believe this to be true. I wont even try to refute this because its all subjective.

  • source
  • parent