you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 3 years ago (2 children)

Yeah but if this is what it takes to get a recipe search result that isnt 50 ads and a 5 page essay before the actual content, I ain't going to complain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    This is why I use DuckDuckGo instead of Google, and Firefox with a few selected extensions that ensure I almost never see an ad. I would be shocked if Google enabled any long-term ad-free experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    As crappy as googles results seem to have gotten over the last year, anytime I try to set my browser default search to anything else, I end up irritated and going back to Google for 50% of my searches(maybe even more ). Bing is fairly decent, but if the goal is privacy...

    The alternative search engines just always lack the context--ehich presumably google has from me by pilfering my information for the last 2 decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child)

    They’re talking about the ads on the site, not on Google.

    Basically saying if this helps them find sites that focus on content and not extracting profit, they won’t have an issue with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Yep, I get it. Effectively block ads and javascript and it doesn't much matter what a site wants to do. I skip the few that have actually effective paywalls (as opposed to just putting a div over content on the page - as far as I'm concerned, if it's downloaded to my computer, I am allowed to read it). Of course, the sites that load up on ads tend to be pretty low-quality content anyhow.

  • source
  • parent