It's real, they did an article about him. This was supposed to be a soft piece to make him more human. ha ha.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

They are clearly spergs AND billionaires. It looks like such a combination is especially not photogenic

What is funny here, in this post, is their autistic traits and media clumsiness that is so characteristic for rich neurodivergents (as non rich people generally are not in any media obviously)

Hence the post focuses on the spectrum traits and it will be discussed from such angle naturally if we see them

If they were some poor autistic sob from Andalusia then we just would have to rein in our remarks but for billionaires it’s a free game to harass them for any reason. That’s what we agreed upon

Therefore we harass them for autistic displays in media as it is very easy but we must pretend that this is not autism to stay coherent in our moral righteousness and not evoke perils of cognitive dissonance

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I have no idea what I just read.

    Are you saying that we harass billionaires? I'm not sure I like the word harass as that seems almost like stalking. Instead we can make fun of them when they make dumb choices and hold them accountable for there actions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Just going to go on record here. It's not okay to harass anyone here because they're autistic. We're not opening this door, it gets ugly real quick. Further commentary will result in comment removal and potential bans.

    No, it doesn't matter if they're billionaires. There's plenty of actual reasons you can give them shit. Don't touch autism or any other form of hate speech.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment