I know this has been debated a lot during his first term but I'm interested in your thoughts now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'd say that historically fascism is a somewhat nebulous term that tries to cover a few disparate movements, but generally speaking has been a capitalist response to a rising domestic communist movement, and so in Marxism has a very specific/scientific meaning in that regard. So without that movement in the United States currently existing Trump doesn't qualify in my opinion.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    But what if through indoctrination you turn generations of Americans into sleeper agents who will begin frothing at the mouth with fear and anger at the thought of a ‘communist’.

    Then start calling lunch ladies communists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I think you could argue that fascism is more generally the capitalist response to existential threats, which historically was domestic socialist and communist movements, but this definition leaves space to potentially include the present day US. Also, there is an interesting thread to pull relating to how the Trump admin is responding to crises borne out of the contradictions of neoliberalism, which in itself is a form of anticommunist repression created (in part) in response to the domestic socialist movements of the early 20th century.

  • source
  • parent