▲ 1261 ▼ me_irl (feddit.org) submitted 1 year ago by NichEherVielleicht@feddit.org to c/me_irl@lemmy.world 39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] primemagnus@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ArtificialHoldings@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not fine with 90%, but 90% is significantly more reassuring and evidence-based than 0%. And if measuring that last 10% would mean some type of logistical nightmare, then we can act with relative assurance on a 90% likelihood. If you didn't know, that's how every fucking scientific test works. P-value of 0.1. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] primemagnus@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ArtificialHoldings@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago I don't get it. Are you rejecting science as a tool for discerning truth? Did you even read my post? Because I did answer your question about the 90%. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ArtificialHoldings@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not fine with 90%, but 90% is significantly more reassuring and evidence-based than 0%. And if measuring that last 10% would mean some type of logistical nightmare, then we can act with relative assurance on a 90% likelihood. If you didn't know, that's how every fucking scientific test works. P-value of 0.1. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] primemagnus@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ArtificialHoldings@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago I don't get it. Are you rejecting science as a tool for discerning truth? Did you even read my post? Because I did answer your question about the 90%. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] primemagnus@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ArtificialHoldings@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago I don't get it. Are you rejecting science as a tool for discerning truth? Did you even read my post? Because I did answer your question about the 90%. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ArtificialHoldings@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago I don't get it. Are you rejecting science as a tool for discerning truth? Did you even read my post? Because I did answer your question about the 90%. permalink fedilink source parent