you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm not fine with 90%, but 90% is significantly more reassuring and evidence-based than 0%. And if measuring that last 10% would mean some type of logistical nightmare, then we can act with relative assurance on a 90% likelihood. If you didn't know, that's how every fucking scientific test works. P-value of 0.1.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments